Sign in or 

|
qwyjibob |
The majority rules.
Dec 11 2008, 3:35 PM EST
So when are you going to realize that America isn't interested in your gay agenda? This is the second time that gay marriage had been voted down, so what do you plan on doing? No one cared about your gay day and no one cares about your behaviors. If you want to be gay, be gay, but don't try to tell me that I have to think that it's acceptable, this is still America and I have as much right to be intolerant to the gay agenda as you have to be gay in the first place and I'm THE MAJORITY OF AMERICA! I find it funny that the president elect doesn't even want gay marriage, but for some reason you think that because you practice cunnilingus or sodomy that you are a race... you're not. You have a behavior not an ethnicity. I think you should settle with civil unions with the same rights and realize that marriage was instituted by the Bible and I'm pretty sure most of you don't care about the Bible in the first place. P.S Don;t try to tag me as a racist, I have a degree in acting with an emphasis on musical theater and I've had a lot of dear gay friends. 1 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?
Keyword tags:
Butt Pirates
|
|
mr_e38 |
1. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 11 2008, 5:01 PM EST
"So when are you going to realize that America isn't interested in your gay agenda? This is the second time that gay marriage had been voted down, so what do you plan on doing? No one cared about your gay day and no one cares about your behaviors. If you want to be gay, be gay, but don't try to tell me that I have to think that it's acceptable, this is still America and I have as much right to be intolerant to the gay agenda as you have to be gay in the first place and I'm THE MAJORITY OF AMERICA! I find it funny that the president elect doesn't even want gay marriage, but for some reason you think that because you practice cunnilingus or sodomy that you are a race... you're not. You have a behavior not an ethnicity. I think you should settle with civil unions with the same rights and realize that marriage was instituted by the Bible and I'm pretty sure most of you don't care about the Bible in the first place.I know that straight people are not interested in the “gay agenda” but you know, its people like you that we need to have are rights in law because in the past, for us there were hate crimes don, and I know there hate crimes. This may have been the 2end time this has been voted on but it’s the 2end time that straights hade to lie about it to get there way, why can’t straights tell the truth? I know why, do you? You asked, “so what do you plan on doing?” we plane to have all are rights and laws in righting so people like you as a straight can’t commit hate crimes on anyone or make hate full laws. To say, “No one cared about your gay day and no one cares about your behaviors” is typical of a straight to say, there are people that do care. This still may be America, but I don’t need nor do I have to accept the straight thinking of how gay rights and law should be as an American. You may have the right to be intolerant to the “gay agenda”, but I have the right to be intolerant of the straight agenda. Just to let you know the president elect is in favor of gay marriage. We may not be a race, but won thing is foreshore we are hated on for being who we are, even buy you oh and thank you for saying, “marriage was instituted by the Bible” because you just proved the gay people’s point, which is, that law was made baste on a religion, and in that point is discriminatory on a type of a person. 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
kngcmd |
2. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 11 2008, 5:57 PM EST
"So when are you going to realize that America isn't interested in your gay agenda? This is the second time that gay marriage had been voted down, so what do you plan on doing? No one cared about your gay day and no one cares about your behaviors. If you want to be gay, be gay, but don't try to tell me that I have to think that it's acceptable, this is still America and I have as much right to be intolerant to the gay agenda as you have to be gay in the first place and I'm THE MAJORITY OF AMERICA! I find it funny that the president elect doesn't even want gay marriage, but for some reason you think that because you practice cunnilingus or sodomy that you are a race... you're not. You have a behavior not an ethnicity. I think you should settle with civil unions with the same rights and realize that marriage was instituted by the Bible and I'm pretty sure most of you don't care about the Bible in the first place.You may have an acting degree, obviously social studies wasn't your strong suit. This country was formed to protect the rights of the minorities, so no, the majority doesn't rule. If it did, interracial marriage would still be outlawed, non-whites would not be able to vote (and even though they are a statistical majority - neither could women). I normally don't care about "agendas" that don't fit the group I identify with either, because 99% of the time it doesn't affect me. But I do care about people having their rights taken away, because I am a good person who is capable of empathy. I could care less about stuff that has an effect on people in musical theater, because not only do I not participate in it, but I'd rather have bamboo under my fingernails than watch or listen to it (I'm more of a Slayer fan myself). But if they tried to take away basic rights away from you, I'd pay attention and even help, even though you personally don't deserve it. And you are right, this doesn't make you a racist, it makes you a homophobe. 2 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
qwyjibob |
3. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 13 2008, 7:08 PM EST
You never had your rights taken away, you never had them in the first place. All you had was the ideology of left wing justices in San Francisco that over turned the will of the people the first time, in 2001. You are just mad that California isn't as crazy as you think they are. And quit comparing your BEHAVIOR to black people. You have nothing to do with civil rights, you practice sodomy, congratulations. And if I was homophobic, that's as much my right to be homophobic as you have a right to be a homo. Good luck man, if the vote goes through by the will of the people then so be it, I'm a libertarian not a Fascist like you that forces their will on others, even though the majority doesn't want it. Do you find this valuable? |
|
mr_e38 |
4. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 13 2008, 8:41 PM EST
"You never had your rights taken away, you never had them in the first place. All you had was the ideology of left wing justices in San Francisco that over turned the will of the people the first time, in 2001. You are just mad that California isn't as crazy as you think they are. And quit comparing your BEHAVIOR to black people. You have nothing to do with civil rights, you practice sodomy, congratulations. And if I was homophobic, that's as much my right to be homophobic as you have a right to be a homo.Ok there was nothing in law that said that gay people can not be married until now; it was just a taboo, why do you think there was a long line of gay people getting married, and on that note the people that did get married, there marriage is still legal, for you to say that we hade no rights is dumb of you, we did have rights just not gay rights, think about that for a while, we hade to go out and make laws and rights just for gay people because of hate crimes, and they were hate crimes, and yes we are just like black people because we were just as hated for being who we are and the only real resin why black people even hade a marriage and hade sex in the first place is so they can make baby’s for white people to sell, there marriage was not a real marriage it was tell death or destines do you part. Why don’t you do some history and learn something you dumb fuck, women hade no rights because they were women, why don’t you say something about that. Do you find this valuable? |
|
hd2008 |
5. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 14 2008, 1:47 AM EST
"This may have been the 2end time this has been voted on but it’s the 2end time that straights hade to lie about it to get there way, why can’t straights tell the truth? I know why, do you? "Would you mind expounding on this thought? I'm curious what "lie(s)" all of the "straight" people told... Do you find this valuable? |
|
hd2008 |
6. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 14 2008, 1:50 AM EST
Would it be the "lie" about homosexuality being ordered by certain officals to be taught to Kindergarteners?http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54420 Do you find this valuable? |
|
mr_e38 |
7. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 14 2008, 4:17 PM EST
"Would it be the "lie" about homosexuality being ordered by certain officals to be taught to Kindergarteners?Maybe you should read more often, here is what the article said, as a gay man I don’t think it would be a good thing to teach about gay people in school. “A federal judge in Massachusetts has ordered the "gay" agenda taught to Christians who attend a public school in Massachusetts, finding that they need the teachings to be "engaged and productive citizens." U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf yesterday dismissed a civil rights lawsuit brought by David Parker, ordering that it is reasonable, indeed there is an obligation, for public schools to teach young children to accept and endorse homosexuality. Wolf essentially adopted the reasoning in a brief submitted by a number of homosexual-advocacy groups, who said "the rights of religious freedom and parental control over the upbringing of children … would undermine teaching and learning…" http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54420 Do you find this valuable? |
|
mr_e38 |
8. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 14 2008, 4:37 PM EST
"Would you mind expounding on this thought? I'm curious what "lie(s)" all of the "straight" people told... "Allowing gay people to marry is not letting kids learn about gay people in school, the article said, and I quote, “A federal judge in Massachusetts has ordered the "gay" agenda taught to Christians who attend a public school in Massachusetts, finding that they need the teachings to be "engaged and productive citizens." U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf yesterday dismissed a civil rights lawsuit brought by David Parker, ordering that it is reasonable, indeed there is an obligation, for public schools to teach young children to accept and endorse homosexuality.” No were in that statement did it say your kids will know about getting marred, and I don’t know why you think you can say, “Would you mind expounding on this thought? I'm curious what "lie(s)" all of the "straight" people told...” like I said before, people know about gay people only by word of mouth and by the bible, why ells would straight people hate us. Oh and just to let you know, I don’t need to answer you or to any won ells. Do your history. Know the facts, gay people have been discriminated in the past and it is still going on. Do you find this valuable? |
|
mr_e38 |
9. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 14 2008, 4:43 PM EST
"Would it be the "lie" about homosexuality being ordered by certain officals to be taught to Kindergarteners?Is that all you have, your no challenge for me. Do you find this valuable? |
|
hd2008 |
10. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 15 2008, 12:53 AM EST
Of course it's no challenge... you didn't answer my question. What lies did the straight people tell? I know plenty about history. I'm pretty sure you weren't involved in the holocaust, and / or KKK lynchings. You have grown up in a society that is growing in tolerance. I have shown no hate, just asking you to clarify what "lies" were told, since it appears to me that they weren't lies. Perhaps with all of your astounding knowledge, you can back up your claims with facts. Do you find this valuable? |
|
mr_e38 |
11. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 15 2008, 7:44 PM EST
"Of course it's no challenge... you didn't answer my question. What lies did the straight people tell?I did answer your question, Like I said, teaching about gay people is not the same as letting us marry, wow I can’t believe I’m even talking to a dumb ass like you, I’ve handled YOU’RE TIPE before, a smart person would put 2 and 2 together (hint?), haven’t you notices you’re the only won that needs to ask on here. Do you find this valuable? |
|
hd2008 |
12. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 16 2008, 12:08 AM EST
"I did answer your question, Like I said, teaching about gay people is not the same as letting us marry, wow I can’t believe I’m even talking to a dumb ass like you, I’ve handled YOU’RE TIPE before, a smart person would put 2 and 2 together (hint?), haven’t you notices you’re the only won that needs to ask on here. "That's not a lie. That's truth. It was presented in a way to show what "may" happen if we don't take a stand. I'm sorry, but if your marriage means that my child is ordered to learn about homosexuality and same-sex marriage, I'd gladly vote against it again. As much as homosexuality is a personal thing, so is teaching your children. I will teach my children about tolerance and being kind to everyone, but I will do it on MY terms. That was only ONE thing mentioned about it. It's not the only reason we voted pro-8 (or 102 in AZ), it just sunk in deeper. Sorry, bro... your theory doesn't hold water. BTW - I'm the dumb ass, and you can't spell and use proper grammar / punctuation? Hmmm... Do you find this valuable? |
|
mr_e38 |
13. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 16 2008, 12:21 AM EST
"That's not a lie. That's truth. It was presented in a way to show what "may" happen if we don't take a stand. I'm sorry, but if your marriage means that my child is ordered to learn about homosexuality and same-sex marriage, I'd gladly vote against it again. As much as homosexuality is a personal thing, so is teaching your children. I will teach my children about tolerance and being kind to everyone, but I will do it on MY terms. That was only ONE thing mentioned about it. It's not the only reason we voted pro-8 (or 102 in AZ), it just sunk in deeper. Sorry, bro... your theory doesn't hold water.You have no idea what you are talking about, if you’re so right why not show me where it does say that, yes, you’re the dumb ass…. And yes my theory does hold water, marriage and teaching are two different things, think about it. Do you find this valuable? |
|
hd2008 |
14. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 16 2008, 12:36 AM EST
"You have no idea what you are talking about, if you’re so right why not show me where it does say that, yes, you’re the dumb ass…. And yes my theory does hold water, marriage and teaching are two different things, think about it."Your whole existance in life is to argue, isn't it? If I told you the sky was blue, I'm sure you'd say.. "No it's not... it's turquoise" If I told you the sun was bright, you'd say "No, it's not... it's luminous" (of course, if you typed it, you'd undoubtedly spell it wrong) What's your point? No one lied. There was truth to that statement of children as young as Kindergarten-age learning about homosexuality and homosexual marriage. If you would have read further than just the first paragraph, you would have seen this BOLD statement... "As the Lexington schools themselves are arguing, the state's right to force pro-homosexuality indoctrination on other people's children arises directly from former Gov. Mitt Romney's nakedly false and unconstitutional declaration that homosexual marriage is now legal" There was a founded belief that this would also infiltrate into other parts of the nation. As a DIRECT RESULT of a statement that homosexual marriage was legal, they started pushing this indoctrination, without consent of TAX PAYING parents. Do you find this valuable? |
|
mr_e38 |
15. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 16 2008, 1:57 AM EST
"Your whole existance in life is to argue, isn't it? If I told you the sky was blue, I'm sure you'd say.. "No it's not... it's turquoise" If I told you the sun was bright, you'd say "No, it's not... it's luminous" (of course, if you typed it, you'd undoubtedly spell it wrong)The quotation "All men are created equal" is arguably the best-known phrase in any of America's political documents, as the idea it expresses is generally considered the foundation of American government. Thomas Jefferson first used the phrase in the Declaration of Independence as a rebuttal to the going political theory of the day: the Divine Right of Kings. Jefferson borrowed the expression from an Italian friend and neighbor, Philip Mazzei,[1] as noted by Joint Resolution 175 of the 103rd Congress as well as John F. Kennedy in "A Nation Of Immigrants."The opening of the Declaration of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson in 1776, states as follows: “ We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. ” The same sentiment appears in the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780, which predates the U.S. Constitution by seven years, and was the first of its kind in the world.“ Article I. All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness. ” The year 1780 also marks the first time in America that such wording was used to successfully argue against slavery in a court of law: Brom and Bett vs. Ashley. Some[who?] feel these statements illustrate the idea of natural rights, a philosophical concept of the Enlightenment; many of the ideas in the Declaration were borrowed from the English liberal political philosopher John Locke. Locke, however, referred to "life, liberty and Property" rather than the pursuit of happiness. Do you find this valuable? |
|
mr_e38 |
16. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 16 2008, 1:58 AM EST
"Your whole existance in life is to argue, isn't it? If I told you the sky was blue, I'm sure you'd say.. "No it's not... it's turquoise" If I told you the sun was bright, you'd say "No, it's not... it's luminous" (of course, if you typed it, you'd undoubtedly spell it wrong)Letting a type of person marry who they love and teaching is different, I don’t care what the repot had said, straight people saw that as a way to vote yes no it, and I know what the repot had said and I don’t agree whit it. They are two different things, and yes there are lies, the bible says that we are an abomination, which is a lie; the law says that we are equal, which is a lie we are not equal. Marriage has been redefine from, bigotry, 47 wives. Do you find this valuable? |
|
qwyjibob |
17. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 16 2008, 3:35 PM EST
"Who's full of hate? You have to make personal attacks because you have no realistic proof of anything that you are arguing for and the majority of American see it the same way that I do. I bet you're just so sad that everyone doesn't condone what you do, but no ones actions are condoned by everyone. Are you an adolescent or something? Bring some real arguments. Do you find this valuable? |
|
qwyjibob |
18. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 16 2008, 3:43 PM EST
"The quotation "All men are created equal" is arguably the best-known phrase in any of America's political documents, as the idea it expresses is generally considered the foundation of American government. Thomas Jefferson first used the phrase in the Declaration of Independence as a rebuttal to the going political theory of the day: the Divine Right of Kings. Jefferson borrowed the expression from an Italian friend and neighbor, Philip Mazzei,[1] as noted by Joint Resolution 175 of the 103rd Congress as well as John F. Kennedy in "A Nation Of Immigrants."The opening of the Declaration of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson in 1776, states as follows: “ We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. ” The same sentiment appears in the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780, which predates the U.S. Constitution by seven years, and was the first of its kind in the world.“ Article I. All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness. ” The year 1780 also marks the first time in America that such wording was used to successfully argue against slavery in a court of law: Brom and Bett vs. Ashley. Some[who?] feel these statements illustrate the idea of natural rights, a philosophical concept of the Enlightenment; many of the ideas in the Declaration were borrowed from the English liberal political philosopher John Locke. Locke, however, referred to "life, liberty and Property" rather than the pursuit of happiness. "Did you quote this from Wikipedia, if so you have to site it or it's plagiarism. And the other guy is completely right, you can't even spell correctly and I wonder who has been feeding you all these lies. It looks like... YOU ARE JUST A TOOL OF THE GAY AGENDA 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
hd2008 |
19. RE: The majority rules.
Dec 16 2008, 8:48 PM EST
"Did you quote this from Wikipedia, if so you have to site it or it's plagiarism. And the other guy is completely right, you can't even spell correctly and I wonder who has been feeding you all these lies. It looks like...Of course he did. After reading his ramblings, do you really think he could type that clearly? Do you find this valuable? |